Although equality of opportunity is a fundamental idea of the egalitarian project, there is a continuing controversy about the effective distributive implications of the notion.

This paper focuses on this controversy, and maintains that when equality of opportunity is correctly understood, it entails strong distributive implications. In this way, this paper intends to reject the notion that equality of opportunity is associated with a non-institutional idea of meritocracy: an idea which is often used as an ideological tool to make unacceptable inequalities seem acceptable. This paper defends the argument that only an ‘institution-dependent’ conception of equality of opportunity, such as Rawls’ fair equality opportunity, is the most adequate interpretation for a liberal democratic society. Nonetheless, it does not mean that individual merit has no place in liberal democratic societies. Fair equality of opportunity – if correctly understood – is deeply relevant and might contribute to a significant reduction of economic inequality, much more so than is currently perceived in the public debate.

Leia o artigo de Nunzio Alì em https://www.scielo.br/j/bpsr/a/FLsGgTJKYSRWZZ5wKf4zTSc/?format=pdf&lang=en